Are Singles Just PR That Sounds Nice?

In the over-populated world of music, have singles ceased to be about the bottom line and more about identifying your key audiences?

It’s hard to review singles. By the time you’ve got past the initial judgement, realised there’s no story arc in place, and spouted a metaphor or three, you’re down to speculation. What does it mean? What happens next? When’s the album due?

When downloads came along, there seemed to be two schools of thought – either the singles charts had been revolutionised, or it had been ruined. I say, why stop at two choices? In an age where people are more reluctant to part with money in exchange for their music, could we argue that what makes a single ‘successful’ or ‘valuable’ has changed?

The social side of singles has been drowned out by the Internet. Crowded tills, wonky shelves and jangling pockets are a thing of the past, replaced by bank cards, immediacy and anonymity. But bands, labels and publicists know that the conversation can still be found in the right places, which is where singles come into play.

It’s all about answering the ultimate PR question – who cares? No doubt someone, somewhere, will care about an upcoming album release. But blanket press coverage can only take an album so far. The singles are in place to lay the foundations. They start the conversations and the speculation. They build the hype, but they do so in the places where influence is possible.

Take The Used, for example. I’ll be honest; I’m indifferent to them. Always have been. Since post-hardcore music fell by the wayside, they’ve found themselves frozen out. Their business at the moment isn’t about winning new hearts – it’s about satisfying the converted. They’ve secured a reputation and are content to stay put, so their focus now is on keeping in touch with the stakeholders with itching iTunes fingers.

When trying to review “I Come Alive”, I found myself paying more attention to the comments on the host site than I did the song. That’s what started this whole argument. The timing of the single’s release has allowed for ample debate about whether or not the band could recover from the quagmire that was Artwork.

In PR terms, it’s worked a treat. The Used don’t need critical acclaim. They’ve no use for scores of new tag-alongs. Instead what they’ve done is create a hype storm that spans several teacups. The people they’ve reached would probably have bought the album eventually, but by making an early contact and prompting the conversation, The Used have breathed new life into their stagnating reputation, just in the nick of time.

Of course, when it comes to the Radio One hits, of course money matters. But as you move further from the mainstream, I think some bands are starting to wise up to the ways of the web. And fair play to them.


2 thoughts on “Are Singles Just PR That Sounds Nice?

  1. Interesting thought, but singles are products not PR. Admittedly the line is a little blurred when it comes to PR and adverts (two separate entities). I think here though the fact remains that singles and the albums they come from are products, heavily surrounded by and pushed in PR terms online in virals and click-throughs.

    • Agreed, they are still a product. In some cases though, these products really shouldn’t be about the money (e.g. The Used), and instead focus on finding audience groups and making sure they still care (which Sweet’s Law would declare to be PR). So while the single itself isn’t PR, its purpose is, or at least could be. Possibly a misleading headline? Lovely to hear from you on the matter though, Tasha!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s